Picket Line

← All unions and employers

CEPUv

Thales Australia Limited

Manufacturing and associated industries

Follow
Latest developmentPartly passed13 Mar 2026

Where things stand: Last development: partly passed. As far as the documents show.

  1. Bargaining
  2. Ballot
  3. Agreement

Where this has got to, as far as the documents show.

Ballots33 passed
Union agreements0naming this union. 11 on this employer's record since 2023.
First on record6 Jan 2025Ballot passed
Protected action windowClosedThe window has ended

Developments

From FWC documents or a linked source. Newest first; earlier years are folded away.

2026 1 development
  1. Partly passed

    80% turnout (4 of 5 eligible) · 50–100% voted yes

    Ballot details →
2025 2 developments
  1. Ballot passed

    95% turnout (18 of 19 eligible) · 100% voted yes

    Ballot details →
  2. Ballot passed

    18 eligible voters · 100% voted yes

    Ballot details →
Agreements for this employer 11 since 2023

From the FWC's register, matched by employer name. Ones naming this union count as developments above; the others may cover different workers or unions.

Ballots 3 · each a separate vote by a group of employees
CEPU
Thales Australia Limited
FWC matter B2026/164 · 13 Mar 2026
80% turnout (4 of 5 eligible) · 50–100% voted yes†
Partly passedDetails →FWC result ↗
CEPU
Thales Australia Limited
FWC matter B2025/1741 · 5 Dec 2025
95% turnout (18 of 19 eligible) · 100% voted yes†
Ballot passedDetails →FWC result ↗
CEPU
Thales Australia
FWC matter B2024/1652 · 6 Jan 2025
18 eligible voters · 100% voted yes
Ballot passedDetails →FWC result ↗
Same employer, other unions 1
AMWUv Thales Australia Limited
Ballot passed · 13 Mar 2026
Full history →

FWC agreement records for this employer go back to 2010. Picket Line covers what unions are doing now, so anything before 2023 is outside its scope. Search the FWC agreements list ↗

About this page. It puts together public Fair Work Commission documents about one union and one employer and shows what they say, in date order. It does not say why anything happened, and entries from different dates may concern different groups of workers. Agreements are matched to employers by name, so check the linked record. Nothing here is legal advice. Spotted a mistake? Tell us.